When a spouse dies, superannuation rarely behaves the way people expect. Many assume it passes automatically to the estate and then distributed via the will, the same way a jointly held asset would.
It doesn't, and that gap in understanding is one of the most common causes of delay and frustration we see with clients navigating bereavement and settling a partner's estate.
Super isn't automatically part of the estate
Unlike a house, an investment portfolio or money in a bank account, superannuation sits outside the estate. It isn’t an asset your will can control.
Super is held in trust, which means the member must tell the fund’s trustee who the beneficiary is to be, not the executor of the estate. That’s the role of a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN): it records with the trustee exactly who should receive the balance, and in what proportions
When a nomination doesn’t hold up
We regularly see nominations that were never lodged, left to lapse, or drafted in a way that doesn’t hold up under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (the SIS Act), the SIS Regulations and the fund’s governing rules. Clients sometimes assume a BDBN can capture a broader wish or intention, when in fact it only takes effect if it meets the strict legal requirements to be a valid, binding direction.
Any of those situations hands the decision back to the trustee’s discretion. For a grieving spouse, that can mean months of calls, forms and uncertainty before a death benefit is actually paid, and the outcome isn’t always what the deceased intended.
A few practical points
- Lapsing nominations generally expire every three years. If they’re not renewed, the trustee decides where the money goes, which may not reflect the deceased’s wishes.
- Non-lapsing nominations don’t expire, but they still need reviewing after major life events — a death, divorce or remarriage.
- SMSFs run on different rules again. The trust deed, alongside the relevant legislation, is the ultimate authority — so check it was drafted with your specific situation in mind, not from a generic template.
- Wording matters more than people expect. Vague or incorrectly worded nominations can be found invalid, and courts don’t have the power to interpret intent the way they can with a will.
- Only eligible dependants (or your estate) can be nominated. Naming someone who isn’t — for example an adult sibling or a friend — can render the nomination invalid and hand the decision back to the trustee.
For more on who counts as a dependant and how benefits can be paid, see the ATO’s guidance on superannuation death benefits.
It’s not just about super
Super gets most of the attention because the rules are complicated and frequently changing, but it’s only one part of the picture.
A comprehensive review after losing a spouse should cover more than superannuation. It should also take in the will, enduring powers of attorney and the broader estate structure, including assets held individually, assets held jointly, and shares in private companies. It’s worth confirming whether these pass to beneficiaries directly or through a testamentary trust, and whether the estate plan still reflects the household’s actual situation and named beneficiaries.
Life insurance held inside super is easy to miss, too. Like death benefits, insurance proceeds paid through a super fund follow the fund’s nomination rules rather than passing automatically to the estate, and they’re often overlooked until a claim is already being processed.
There’s also the practical side. Trustee decisions and probate can take months, so it helps to understand what’s accessible in the meantime and what isn’t, to avoid unnecessary financial pressure on top of everything else during a difficult time.
Finally, the financial plan itself should be reviewed for the surviving spouse. A strategy and portfolio built for a couple’s combined income and goals may no longer suit one person’s circumstances, objectives, timeframe or tolerance for risk.
What’s changed with Division 296
From 1 July 2026, Division 296 introduces an additional tax on individuals whose total superannuation balance exceeds $3 million — significantly altering the traditional advice framework for death benefit and re-contribution strategies. Broadly, an extra 15% applies to the earnings attributable to the balance above $3 million, with a further 10% on earnings attributable to any balance above $10 million. Both thresholds are indexed to CPI, and — following changes to the original proposal — the tax applies only to realised earnings, not unrealised (paper) gains.
Death and estate implications
The death and estate implications are significant and often overlooked. In the year of death, the member’s balance at the start of the year is used to determine the liability, so an assessment can still arise — and it falls to the legal personal representative to settle it. In blended families, where a surviving spouse receives super directly while children from a prior relationship are estate beneficiaries, this can create genuine inequity.
Key questions to revisit
Where a spouse holds a large balance, or where balances may be consolidated following death, it’s important to revisit:
- Whether the combined balance post-inheritance pushes you over the $3 million threshold.
- Whether a death benefit is better taken as a lump sum, an income stream, or split between the two, given the tax treatment differs.
- Whether existing re-contribution or recontribution-and-withdrawal strategies still make sense once your own balance changes.
- How this interacts with any binding nominations already in place for your own super, since your estate plan may now need updating too.
This isn’t a “set and forget” area even in ordinary circumstances, and a change of this size means the settings that made sense a year ago might not anymore.
You can read the current rules and thresholds on the ATO’s page covering Division 296 tax on large super balances.
What we’d recommend reviewing
- Check whether a BDBN exists, whether it’s lapsing or non-lapsing, and when it was last updated.
- Read the SMSF trust deed, if relevant, rather than assuming it covers what you think it does.
- Review the will and estate structure alongside super to confirm they’re pointing in the same direction and beneficiaries are correctly named.
- Check any insurance held inside super and how the proceeds will be paid out.
- Get a clear picture of the tax implications on any death benefit, particularly where both dependants and non-dependants (adult children, for example) are involved.
- Reassess your own total super balance in light of Division 296 if you’re now inheriting a balance.
- Revisit the strategy and cashflow needs now that circumstances have changed.
- Don’t wait for a crisis to review it — the best time to fix a binding nomination is well before it’s needed, not during probate.
Our Private Wealth team can help you review your estate, super and broader financial position. Get in touch to arrange a confidential discussion.
.jpg)



